Monday, 15 October 2012

Roger Ballen poor







Roger Ballen was born in New York USA in 1950, he studied Psychology at degree level and moved to South Africa after the age of 20 and began to photograph normal life in small villages of South Africa. He mainly focused on people who had something wrong with them, for example having an embarrassing body, on the other hand he's focus was towards poor people. However his work didn't take off until early 1990's. When he started to do documentary photography (looking at a photograph could describe the person's appearance, personality, age etc)
























Annie Leibovitz (image analysis)


Annie Leibovitz

Photographer Annie Leibovitz was born October 2, 1949, in Waterbury, Connecticut. In 1970 she took a job at Rolling Stone magazine. In 1983 she began working for the entertainment magazine Vanity Fair. During the late 1980s, Leibovitz started to work on a number of high-profile advertising campaigns. From the 1990s to the present, she has been publishing and exhibiting her work.

Rolling Stone Magazine

 

She was one of the six children born to Sam, an Air Force lieutenant, and Marilyn Leibovitz, a modern dance instructor. In 1967, Leibovitz enrolled at the San Francisco Art Institute, where (although initially studying painting) she developed a love for photography.

After living briefly on an Israeli kibbutz, Leibovitz returned to the U.S., in 1970, and applied for a job with the start-up rock music magazine Rolling Stone. Impressed with Leibovitz’s portfolio, editor Jann Wenner offered her a job as a staff photographer. Within two years, the 23-year-old Leibovitz was promoted to chief photographer - a title she would hold for the next 10 years. Her position with the magazine afforded her the opportunity to accompany the Rolling Stones band on their 1975 international tour.

Vanity Fair


In 1983, Leibovitz left Rolling Stone and began working for the entertainment magazine Vanity Fair. With a wider array of subjects, Leibovitz’s photographs for Vanity Fair ranged from presidents to literary icons to teen heartthrobs. To date, a number of Vanity Faircovers have featured Leibovitz’s stunning - and often controversial - portraits of celebrities. Demi Moore (very pregnant and very nude) and Whoopi Goldberg  (half-submerged in a bathtub of milk) are among the most remembered actresses to grace the cover in recent years. Known for her ability to make her sitters become physically involved in her work, one of Leibovitz’s most famous portraits is of the late artist Keith Haring, who painted himself like one of his canvases for the photo.

Later Work

Widely considered one of America’s best portrait photographers, Annie Leibovitz published the book Women (1999), which was accompanied by an essay by friend and novelist Susan Sontag. With its title subject matter, Leibovitz presented an array of female images from Supreme Court Justices to Vegas showgirls to coal miners and farmers. Currently, many of her original prints are housed in various galleries throughout the United States.
In 2005, the Brooklyn Museum of Art did a retrospective on her work entitled "Annie Leibovitz: A Photographer’s Life, 1990-2005." As busy as ever, Annie Leibovitz continues to be in demand as portrait photographer, often capturing arresting images of today’s celebrities.
Annie Leibovitz is the mother of three children. At the age of 51, she had her daughter, Sarah. In 2005, her twin daughters, Susan and Samuelle, were born with the help of a surrogate mother.



Demi Moore: Naked & Pregnant, August 1991 – Vanity Fair 

Shot by famous celebrity photographer Annie Leibovitz, this 1991 Vanity Fair cover featured Demi Moore, who was the first celebrity to appear naked and pregnant on the cover of a magazine. Moore, then 28, and then-husband Bruce Willis were expecting their second child that August. The now famous pose would later be copied by other celebrities such as Cindy Crawford, Britney Spears and Jessica Simpson.
The photograph has a very strong story behind it, this is what made the Vanity Fair magazine take off, because it was the first shot of the most famous celebrity been naked in the history of magazine. The communication you get from this photograph is when you see it, you’re eye catches her stomach been blown up with pregnancy and it’s that big that she has to hold it up with left hand of course the other hand is covering her private area. This is a very important piece of work I think because it’s basically about bringing another human into life and on the other hand it relates to history because eventually the baby born could always look back at this photo which would be a really good memory to have for a parent and her child. It shows the story of a mother going through so much to just to give birth to her child. However the other thing I could think of is to why would she show her private life to the public’s eye, is it something to do with fame, because she could just have the image in her album at home…
Although this piece of photograph does make you investigate further, it’s like half the story has been told and the other half is left. Because you want to know what the baby would be, is it a boy or a girl for instance, if a girl would she be as attractive as her mother. Is that her natural skin colour or has she been in the sunbath before this image had been taken. As the viewer you start to ask yourself a lot of different questions. If you want to know the answer you have to wait until the baby is born. The artist has hidden the story behind this image.
The only symbol I can see on this image is the jewellery ring on her middle finger and the earing she’s got on. Which make you want to explore further to see what’s on the other hand, is she married or not, for instance if you didn’t know the person. I think the artist again is trying to hide the information and the artist want you to interpret what’s all the work about, is it just a memory or a claim to fame by showing herself naked to the public’s eye.
Also the work has a title which shows what it’s all about and what it’s based on which is “vanity Fair” a big magazine company, however what I think is good that it has the date on the front page of the magazine “August 1991” on the other hand they’ve got some information about “how saddam survived” which gives you more idea about when the magazine was made. The title doesn’t suggest anything else apart from the person’s name “More Demi Morre” which basically saying that she’s done it before, it’s not her first time!
Besides I think the colour the artist has used in this image is very important because you get more detail about the person, however the big title “VANITY FAIR” I personally think goes very well with the colour of the skin of Demi Moore but the background is a darkish deemed colour, this is because the artist wants to set the focus of our eye on the person not the background which a portrait should be about. However what I like about this is that artist has chosen her colours very carefully, so they match well, her diamond earring and the ring on her finger matches very well with the white coloured typography she’s used, which makes the image look very simple, because the artist wants your eye to catch the person before you read what’s going on. If for instance artist had used a lot of different colours then I don’t think these would’ve made the person stand out as much, I think as an artist the simpler you create something the better it looks, but you have to really good at what you’re trying to get to the viewers.
As an artist you have to present your work in a very important way, because you want to attract different eyes to your final piece, you want to make people see what’s going on. For instance what you want the viewers to look at you make it stand out from the background or set the focus into the thing you want people to see. Also I think the artist kind of used the rule of thirds in this photo, this is to put most of the body on one side of the image and her belly on the other side, to balance it out however, the space between “VANITY and FAIR” is where her head is placed, this is a good promotion for the company’s name, so she’s not covering anything important apart from the Y and a bit of the F.
I think the technique the artist has used looks simple for example most artist uses light from the side of the object to get shadows of the bend, but in this image I think she’s just used a normal camera flash or an extended flash face to face to the person. This is to set our eye focus on the person’s stomach and her body. Also the good thing is that the artist makes the person stand sideways which covers most of her private sections up and she’s got her hand on her boobs which make you think she’s hiding something. The other good thing about standing sideways is that she’s displaying the size of her belly is and it gives you a rough idea about how long away the baby might be.

Felix Nadar 1820 -1910

Felix Nadar 1820 -1910

Was a bit of an entrepreneur and dabbled in lots of things including writing plays and inventing crowd control barriers.  He was persuaded to move into photography by a friend in the 1850’s as it was seen as an up and coming profession.  He took many photographs of famous people at that time, this included Jules Vern a writer who is famous for such books as ‘A journey to the centre of the Earth’.
He initially set his brother up in the photography business and then became interested himself so joined him.  Apparently his brother Adrian lacked commitment and so it’s Nadar himself who was the one who made some stunning photographs for that time in history.
 Nadar made numerous self-portraits, which allowed him to experiment with poses and gestures before using the camera on his subjects.

This is an image taken of Sarah Bernhardt a famous actress at the time.  Nadar had got better with his posing using a side profile and also the actress was covered in a velvet drape and this put the emphasis on her neck and face.
Ref;  
http://www.getty.edu/art/
The disadvantage all those years ago were photographers like Nadar did not have the advantage of digital and computer technology.   If I was to reproduce in the style of Nadar I would use the technology of software such as Photoshop to enhance the image.  People aren't grey. Skies are not black or grey or white.  You have to consider that.

Focusing deep into this image you get the feeling that there’s a story behind this photograph, it’s like you want to be inside her head and think what she’s visualising, the reason behind it is because she's not looking directly at the camera, she's focusing on something else. Looking at the corners of the photo, it seems like it has been scratched or burnt in some sort of way, which clearly gives the image a very old vintage effect and from there we can roughly say how old the image could be. It gives you the feeling of the portrait been under the ray of sunlight for a long period of time. However the other thing that makes the photograph look old is the actress’s hair style and the type of blanket she’s got wrapped around her. It doesn’t look very attractive in comparison to what we have in the twenty first century.

As you first look at the image, you catch the actress eyes however her focus is on something else which makes you want to investigate what she’s looking at.  then you start to look at what she’s got on round her body, and it make you wonder has she got any clothes on beneath the blanket, is the room temperature not at the right level and why is she leaning on a wooden cabinet, has she maybe been making love? You as the viewer start to ask yourself a whole load of weird questions that you can’t answer about the portrait.

There are not many symbols used in this image but the only one I see on this image is the ring on her finger which represents she must be married, you can’t really see the ring in detail until you focus right into the photograph. The hidden meaning behind this portrait is one of intrigue why use a blanket was this staged or taken at her house?  You could imagine she has just gotten out of bed and covered herself up. Looking at her eyes, they looked relaxed. Is this staged to look sensuous?  The artist leaves the interpretation up to you as the viewer. Other viewers might look at the image and interpret it totally different to my personal summarisation but as a young male this is the impression I get.

Although there is a title to on the picture but I can’t read the message the artist is trying to get through to the viewer. I personally think it might be the artist’s signature.

The important thing about the colour in this image is that it’s in black and white, thinking about black and white photography and the time the portrait had been taken, photographers didn’t have the advantage of digital photography compared to what we have today. The advantage over the past photographers, for example we have cameras that take pictures with which show every small detail on a person’s portrait. As the image is black and white, you can’t really see the light shades on each folded bits of the blanket. However people are not grey coloured so I think us as the viewer would’ve got more detail about the person if it was done in colour, we can’t really see whether the actress is mixed race or Caucasian. Not many Caucasian’s have curly hair.

What I like about the image is that Nadar shown the light from one side of the person, but I don’t think they would’ve had any photography lights to use at the time, so I think he might’ve used a natural day light. But the shadow that’s created behind her neck and in every bend of the blanket gives more detail on the image and the person’s face

It’s such an old image that you can’t really see the space it’s been presented in, it’s black and white and the person looks gray but the artist has used rule of thirds to capture the image. The effect that has been created by using this rule is that it puts the person’s body on one side of the image, face been in the middle of the photograph, which is the most important thing about a portrait Although around the person there’s a lot of negative space but I personally think that’s part of portraiture because you’re trying to show the person not what’s around them.

Nadar has used some kind of cloth material to cover the body of the person up with but photos been in black and white and the camera’s not been as good as what we get today, I think he was trying to show the actress’s face and shoulders  more, because our eye always are attracted to bare skin. Using the folds in the material gives some depth to the image while focusing the viewer on the actresses face and shoulders. Although it looks old material it appears to have a richness to it. I think using different textures and colours in old black and white photography were necessary to enhance the images. 

Monday, 8 October 2012

Roger Ballen

Roger Ballen was born in New York USA in 1950, he studied Psychology at degree level and moved to South Africa after the age of 20 and began to photograph normal life in small villages of South Africa. He mainly focused on people who had something wrong with them, for example having an embarrassing body, on the other hand he's focus was towards poor people. However his work didn't take off until early 1990's. When he started to do documentary photography (when looking at a photograph could describe the person's appearance, personality, age etc)

Directly I think, as photographer he's different from many other artists because he's showing you what life is like for some people who might not be wealthy or have might have something wrong with them. However the other good thing about him is that he's always takes pictures in black and white, now I personally think that it shows more detail of the person's portrait, because more color brings more distraction to the image






Roger Ballen - Two Figures, 2000

Sam Taylor Wood (1 image analysis)

Samantha "Sam" Taylor-Johnson is professionally known as Sam Taylor-Wood, she was born on 4th of March 1967 and is an English filmmaker, photographer and visual artist. As part of my AS year she was one of my chosen artist and I was influenced to reproduce some excellent images after looking at her ‘Self Portrait levitating’ series. Although I looked at the Crying men work she did last year I have explored that further when considering my unit 3 project which is exploring portraiture
Crying Men is a series of photographic portraits of famous film actors by Sam Taylor-Wood. Taylor –Wood asked each of these actors perform and cry for the camera while she photographed them.
Taylor-Wood wants the viewer to decide for themselves which were real tears and which were fake. She did say it was difficult for some of them to show their feelings and she had wanted to get masculine men and show a different side to them, visualising the image below for instance:
Looking at the actor deep into his one eye, it makes you feel like the image is communicating with you in a special sort of way, it’s like he’s almost looking deep into your soul. the important thing about this image is the detailed shades on the wrinkles, it makes you feel like you want to investigate more? For example what’s he thinking? What’s the true meaning behind this and what is the artist trying to get through to the viewer?
The ring on his finger has a clear number one printed on it, the first impression you get is was it someone special to him that something bad might’ve happened to? It also it represent a symbol too which only means something to the actor himself, maybe there’s a hidden meaning behind the symbol.  But the artist gives you the opportunity to interpret the symbol in whichever way you’d like to.
Colour is very important in this photograph especially using black and white, it gives a good detail of the wrinkles on the actors face and it kind of effects the viewer’s emotion when you look at the detail in one eye, you get the feeling that it’s looking very deep into your soul. On the other hand the other eye is covered by his finger that has got the ring on, basically the ring represents the other eye. I personally think that using black and white gives more detail of a portraiture, this because there’s nothing else in focus apart from the face of the person, if there was more things going on the background then the artist could’ve maybe used colour. I think a simple colour could change the whole meaning of the image, depending on the type of portrait.
I think you could spend a lot of time looking for the true meaning behind this piece of work, because it gives you the feeling of wanting to investigate more about the person and his feelings. Looking at the image for a longer period of time, everything sort of breaks down into more detail. Say if it was a film you’d watch all of it starting from the beginning to the end.


The techniques Sam Taylor Wood has used is black and white image, to show the detail of the portrait however she’s used lightning effects from the left side of the image this is so you could see every small detail (wrinkle) of the face. The techniques of the lightning effects that she’s used tell you how you could change a piece of work from simple portrait to a very detailed one. I personally think this is what makes professionals different from others



Sam Taylor Wood

Samantha "Sam" Taylor-Johnson is professionally known as Sam Taylor-Wood, she was born on 4th of March 1967 and is an English filmmaker, photographer and visual artist. She started Art school at 16 and later attended Goldsmiths College in London. After she left college she worked in a bar and also helping with costumes behind the scenes of the Royal opera House. Before she started photography and film making she also did some sculpting. However it was her boldness in photography and films that began to create a name for her. While working for a nightclub she came with the idea of photographing the bouncers in their scary pose used for working on the doors this was done in front of some paintings at the Tate art gallery in London.  This was what she wanted, to be controversial. Taylor Wood has had numerous successful group and solo exhibitions including the Turner Prize in 1998.
David was her father’s name, who left the family when she was nine. Her mother, Geraldine, is a yoga teacher and astrologist. She has one younger sister Ashley, and a maternal step-brother, Kristian. Taylor-Wood grew up near Streatham Common in south London until her parents' divorce. She lived with her step-father until she was 16, before moving out to live on her own in Hastings-by-the-Sea
In August 2008, Taylor-Wood was chosen to direct Nowhere Boy, a biopic about the childhood of the Beatles' singer, John Lennon. However she started a relationship with the Star from Nowhere boy who is 23 years younger than her they announced their engagement on 2009 and got married 21 June 2012 and both took the name Taylor Johnson. The couple have two daughters together born before they were married.
As part of my AS year she was one of my chosen artist and I was influenced to reproduce some excellent images after looking at her ‘Self Portrait levitating’ series. Although I looked at the Crying men work she did last year I have explored that further when considering my unit 3 project which is exploring portraiture.
Crying Men is a series of photographic portraits of famous film actors by Sam Taylor-Wood. Taylor –Wood asked each of these actors perform and cry for the camera while she photographed them.
Taylor-Wood wants the viewer to decide for themselves which were real tears and which were fake. She did say it was difficult for some of them to show their feelings and she had wanted to get masculine men and show a different side to them, visualising the image below for instance:
Looking at the actor deep into his one eye, it makes you feel like the image is communicating with you in a special sort of way, it’s like he’s almost looking deep into your soul. the important thing about this image is the detailed shades on the wrinkles, it makes you feel like you want to investigate more? For example what’s he thinking? What’s the true meaning behind this and what is the artist trying to get through to the viewer?
The ring on his finger has a clear number one printed on it, the first impression you get is was it someone special to him that something bad might’ve happened to? It also it represent a symbol too which only means something to the actor himself, maybe there’s a hidden meaning behind the symbol.  But the artist gives you the opportunity to interpret the symbol in whichever way you’d like to.
Colour is very important in this photograph especially using black and white, it gives a good detail of the wrinkles on the actors face and it kind of effects the viewer’s emotion when you look at the detail in one eye, you get the feeling that it’s looking very deep into your soul. On the other hand the other eye is covered by his finger that has got the ring on, basically the ring represents the other eye. I personally think that using black and white gives more detail of a portraiture, this because there’s nothing else in focus apart from the face of the person, if there was more things going on the background then the artist could’ve maybe used colour. I think a simple colour could change the whole meaning of the image, depending on the type of portrait.
I think you could spend a lot of time looking for the true meaning behind this piece of work, because it gives you the feeling of wanting to investigate more about the person and his feelings. Looking at the image for a longer period of time, everything sort of breaks down into more detail. Say if it was a film you’d watch all of it starting from the beginning to the end.
The artist has used rule of thirds in this image, ring and part of the eye being on one of the lines, I think this is to display most of the person’s face in the middle of the photograph to give it more depth and arty, because that’s what gives you the recognition of who the person is in the portrait. Around the environment you can hardly see what’s round the person, but on the right hand side (ring) you can see something looks like a cabinet or a curtain but the main focus is on the face. The reason it’s dark on the background is because the artist is trying to focus on the face not the background, which I personally think a portrait should be all about.
The techniques Sam Taylor Wood has used is black and white image, to show the detail of the portrait however she’s used lightning effects from the left side of the image this is so you could see every small detail (wrinkle) of the face. The techniques of the lightning effects that she’s used tell you how you could change a piece of work from simple portrait to a very detailed one. I personally think this is what makes professionals different from others

Friday, 5 October 2012

Imogen Cunningham


Cunningham, Imogen 1883-1976
Started taking images of plant life and her portrait work came much later. I do think she was a trend setter as she took some good nude images well before anyone else dared to. 


Some of her work was pretty good especially when you look at the ones layered over the top of each other and it displays like its being done using computer software but, at the time they didn’t have software’s like PhotoShop. What I think she’s done is to use multiple films and layer them on top of each other and exposed the light through them, which then reflect on the light sensitive paper and you get an image. I think it’s really clever what she’s done. Unless you’re a photographer yourself, or knowing how the dark room works, it makes you wonder how she’s done it!

Sam Taylor Wood Further research





I looked at the work of Sam Taylor–Wood in my AS year and was influenced to reproduce some suspended images after looking at her ‘
Self Portrait Suspended’ series. Although I looked at the Crying men work she did last year I have explored that further when considering my topic portrait in unit 3.
Crying Men is a series of photographic portraits of famous film actors by Sam Taylor-Wood. Taylor –Wood asked each of these actors perform and cry for the camera while she photographed them.
Taylor-Wood wants the viewer to decide for themselves which were real tears and which were fake. She did say it was difficult for some of them to show their feelings and she had wanted to get masculine men and show a different side to them
I think if these subjects were not known or were not famous we wouldn’t even question if the sadness was real. We would assume it was real.
I think portraits, whether they are taken on film or digitally still depend on the photographers ability to use decent light and pose the subject. Taylor-Wood has a skill of bringing in the unexpected. She goes one step further to make you question what you are seeing. In her ‘self suspended’ series she made me think ‘how does she do that?’ with the ‘crying men series’ she will get a response from the viewer. Either ‘are these tears real?’ or it’s not what people expect, men crying. Will the viewer think about themselves, would I allow someone to capture something private?
As well as photography Sam Taylor-Wood makes films that challenge and provoke emotion.
Her film showing David Beckham asleep taken in 2004 is controversial.  Firstly why does she choose a famous footballer who is usually very active? I think he is considered an attractive guy and the way the film was taken it implies the photographer was lying next to him in bed. This makes you think was this staged like a photo shoot? Or does she know him? He has been linked to the press to pretty girls outside of his marriage.  Either way it gets people talking about Taylor Wood and her work.
Another short film she made was a 2 minute film to promote International Women's Day. This sees Daniel Craig playing the super-spy James Bond showing gender in equality.  The voice over is by his MI5 boss M, as played by Judi Dench in the recent movies. Basically Taylor Wood gives out a strong message that woman are not treated fairly, a bit like how woman are treated by some in Islam.
Overall I would say Taylor Wood uses all different techniques and elements within the images she takes such as lighting, shapes, and movements within the shoot. Most of all though there is a sexual undertone to her work maybe this is to shock a bit in an acceptable way. The way she uses attractive guys in her photo’s or films. The half dressed photos of herself in the suspended series and then her self portrait ‘suck, fuck, spank, wank’. This image is defiant a bit like me.






Tuesday, 2 October 2012

Zed Nelson


Zed Nelson
I chose to look at the work of Zed Nelson who exhibition I viewed at the Light Infantry Museum a few weeks ago.  He was capturing people’s vanity and preoccupation with themselves. He did this by looking at lots of different areas over a period of time and also across world cultures. He took images of cosmetic surgeons at work and their patients. Other areas included anorexics, child beauty queens, bodybuilders, trainee models, housewives, porn stars and people having breast implants.

The image he took of a ‘tummy tuck’ looks horrific to me.

The colour has the most impact as you realise its blood and an open abdomen.  I think this image in particular is out to shock. Why have major surgery when eating less and exercising would be a natural way to reduce your size. Nelson is out to show how some individuals are obsessed with body image enough to have surgery.  While thinking about this image I also realise there is a surgeon out there happy to make money doing what is not really essential surgery.
I don’t know if permission was given by the patient to have this image taken but its obvious from the background it’s in a surgical theatre. In some of his other images people seem willing to be photographed. I’m not sure I would if I was having something like this done. Some of the cosmetic surgery is quite private and almost seems an invasion into participants privacy.
His images show the subject frailties and insecurities
We all have these insecurities, you only need to take a look at Facebook for example to see the images people present of themselves

Monday, 1 October 2012

What is a Portrait?


A portrait is someones photograph, painting, or an artistic representation of a person, in which the face and its expression is shown. The intent is to display the likeness, personality and even the mood of the person. For this reason, in photography a portrait is generally not a snapshot, but a composed image of a person in a still position. A portrait often shows a person looking directly at the painter or photographer, in order to most successfully engage the subject with the viewer.

Saturday, 22 September 2012

Cecil Beaton


Cecil Beaton has done a lot of portrait work of famous people including Queen Elizabeth. I like this photograph as it shows her as a mother and not in her formal role as Monarch. It’s a portrait that focuses on the Queen and her child, there is no obvious background to distract the viewer. I’m not sure whether Beaton will have controlled the background or just avoided distraction so the focus is on the Queen. I think he will not have had the techniques at the time the photograph was taken to crop out the background so more planning will have been needed.Obviously it was taken a long time ago but I like the simple quality to the photograph and the fact it’s black and white. Beaton uses light effectively on his photographs in lots of different ways.   In this one I think he will have used 2 studio lights to remove the shadow. Artificial light does not have to be harsh. I think it will have been gentler in this photograph.It’s not a formal dignified portrait photograph like some of the other photographs he’s taken of the Queen but this one captures warmth and love. The natural pose seems to capture a far away look in the Queens eye. Mother and child images are popular because they show us as human.

I took this image of my brother and his new wife on their wedding day. They holding a cousins baby and it reminded of the warmth and love I’d seen in Beaton’s work. I realised it was a moment I had to capture. For me the image seems very natural and not posed

Tuesday, 18 September 2012

Sam Taylor–Wood Crying Men


I looked at the work of Sam Taylor–Wood in my AS year and was influenced to reproduce some suspended images after looking at her ‘Self Portrait Suspended’ series. Although I looked at the Crying men work she did last year I have explored that further when considering my topic portrait in unit 3.

Crying Men is a series of photographic portraits of famous film actors by Sam Taylor-Wood. Taylor –Wood asked each of these actors perform and cry for the camera while she photographed them.
Taylor-Wood wants the viewer to decide for themselves which were real tears and which were fake. She did say it was difficult for some of them to show their feelings and she had wanted to get masculine men and show a different side to them
I think if these subjects were not known or were not famous we wouldn’t even question if the sadness was real. We would assume it was real.
I think portraits, whether they are taken on film or digitally still depend on the photographers ability to use decent light and pose the subject. Taylor-Wood has a skill of bringing in the unexpected. She goes one step further to make you question what you are seeing. In her ‘self suspended’ series she made me think ‘how does she do that?’ with the ‘crying men series’ she will get a response from the viewer. Either ‘are these tears real?’ or its not what people expect, men crying. Will the viewer think about themselves, would I allow someone to capture something private?
As well as photography Sam Taylor-Wood makes films that challenge and provoke emotion.

Tuesday, 11 September 2012

Garry Parker Animal Portraits

Gary Parker
I chose to look at a photographer who had done some work on animal portraits. This is something I want to try. There are many photographers out there who do this type of work but most I looked at were boring, showing pretty images of fluffy kittens sitting about. I like the work of Gary Parker because he appears to capture the character and spirit of the animal with his images. Research shows many households have at least one pet and in some cases, the pet alleviates Empty Nest Syndrome for older married couples. Their animals are not just pets but companions, and many owners consider their pets their children.  I think Parker captures the best from the animals and the humans he photographs. The owners are often in the photographs and the love they have for their pets is captured by Parker. That’s what makes his photographs different
I notice Parker’s images focus on the object in the foreground while the background is out of focus. This puts the emphasis on the animal. I suspect he also uses photoshop to create layers if he needs to. Many of his images are taken at different angles and heights to create interest. The subjects are often not aware their image has been taken. I think he will take several images and uses the best ones.
Parker is also clever to use some colour in his images, a yellow flower petal floating the a white toilet bowl with the black cat watching in the image below or purple flowers out of focus in the foreground and the subject in the background.
His composition is planned and by that I mean he sets the image up, he considers light, focus, background, colour but most importantly he tells a story. For example the image of the dog and cat makes me think the dog is eating out of the cats bowl. Fluffy is a cats name but perhaps Parker filled the bowl with dog food to set the scene to photograph.



Wednesday, 4 July 2012

FAKE (video)

This video is based on the word "fake" I got given by my photography teacher (Mrs Robinson) however Friday before I was not able to attend my photography lesson as I had to do my driving test (passed) and had a very short time to think about coming a video that indicates the word fake

I made a mind map in my research journal to see what possible ways their would be for me to come up with a video.

Thinking about the word fake, I thought it would be a good idea to give a message to people, mostly kids who likes to smoke and thinks its a cool thing to do. So I photocopied three £10 notes and set a fire to them, using a cigarette lighter to let people know that they're actually burning their money which they don't realize. I've talked through the video as a documentary.

I didn't know that we had to edit the video using some computer software.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xfMEYLTPmBI

Friday, 29 June 2012

Annie Leibovitz (Photographer)

Annie Leibovitz
Annie Leibovitz was born on October 2, 1949, in the USA. While studying painting at the San Francisco Art Institute, she took night classes in photography, and in 1970, she began doing work for Rolling Stone magazine.Her  trademark technique, which involved the use of bold primary colours and surprising poses. One famous issue featured a nude John Lennon curled around his fully clothed wife,Yoko Ono. Taken on December 8, 1980, Leibovitz’s photo of the former Beatle was shot just hours before his death. It was images like this that made some of the Rolling Stone covers collector's items.
She became Rolling Stone’s chief photographer in 1973. By the time she left the magazine, 10 years later, she had shot 142 covers. In 1983, she joined the staff at Vanity Fair, and in 1998, she also began working for Vogue. In addition to her magazine editorial work, Leibovitz has created influential advertising campaigns for American Express and the Gap. She has worked with many arts organizations, including American Ballet Theatre, the Brooklyn Academy of Music, and the Mark Morris Dance Group, and with Mikhail Baryshnikov. She has also written photography books. Exhibitions of her images have appeared at museums and galleries all over the world, including the National Portrait Gallery and the Corcoran Gallery, in Washington, D.C.; the International Center of Photography, in New York; the Brooklyn Museum; the Stedelijk Museum in Amsterdam; the Centre National de la Photographie, in Paris; and the National Portrait Gallery in London. Leibovitz is the recipient of many other honours in both the USA and Internationally.

Cecil Beaton (Photographer)

Cecil Beaton has done a lot of portrait work of famous people including Queen Elizabeth. I like this photograph as it shows her as a mother and not in her formal role as Monarch. It’s a portrait that focuses on the Queen and her child, there is no obvious background to distract the viewer. I’m not sure whether Beaton will have controlled the background or just avoided distraction so the focus is on the Queen. I think he will not have had the techniques at the time the photograph was taken to crop out the background so more planning will have been needed.
Obviously it was taken a long time ago but I like the simple quality to the photograph and the fact it’s black and white. Beaton uses light effectively on his photographs in lots of different ways.   In this one I think he will have used 2 studio lights to remove the shadow. Artificial light does not have to be harsh. I think it will have been gentler in this photograph.
It’s not a formal dignified portrait photograph like some of the other photographs he’s taken of the Queen but this one captures warmth and love. The natural pose seems to capture a far away look in the Queens eye. Mother and child images are popular because they show us as human.


I like the use of light on this image

unfortunately I missed this exhibition but I hope to visit some galleries over the summer break and maybe the portrait gallery or V&A will have some of his works. 

Mario Testino (Photographer)

Mario Testino is one of the world’s most influential photographers. His cultural and commercial zeitgeist has made him a much sought after creative partner in the fashion and beauty industry today. His work has been featured across the globe in magazines from Vogue to Vanity Fair and he has contributed to the success of many leading fashion and beauty houses through advertising campaigns, from Burberry and Gucci to Dolce & Gabbana and Versace.
Testino has had many exhibitions of his photography in museums and galleries around the world. In 2002 The National Portrait Gallery in London opened his exhibition, Portraits by Mario Testino, which is still their highest attended exhibit on record. It then travelled to Milan, Amsterdam, Edinburgh, Tokyo, Mexico City and Lima. In 2010, Testino was invited by the renowned Museo Thyssen-Bornemisza in Madrid to exhibit his work, one of the few living artists to have done so. He has also been invited by the prestigious Museum of Fine Art in Boston, USA, to exhibit in a new show due to open in October 2012; his first museum show in the United States of America.
As a portrait photographer he captures the actors, beauties and worldwide celebrities of the moment, as well as receiving royal commissions from The Prince of Wales, Prince William, Catherine Duchess of Cambridge, Prince Harry, Diana Princess of Wales, and Her Majesty Queen Rania al Abdullah of Jordan.
natalieportman3 V Magazine #62 | Natalie Portman by Mario Testino
In addition to his work in the world’s greatest magazines, Mario Testino has published 10 books of his photography, including MaRio de Janeiro Testino, a tribute to the city and its people that have inspired him so much. His most recent book, Kate Moss by Mario Testino, is a collection of photographs taken of his close friend and muse during their twenty year relationship.

Wednesday, 13 June 2012

Unit 3 Photography idea's & Mind map

This is my first time using blogspot. I'm looking for idea's for my unit 3 photography

the above image was taken by Cecil Beaton, he was famous for his photographs of celebrities and the Royal family however I like some of the work he did in black & white. His work showed how he used daylight to his advantage.




  • looking how media uses models to change the way we look. like men started doing their eyebrows, because some cool models did it (fashion) 
  • Night light photography, low shutter speed
  • Motion photography
  • Portrait photography
  • Black and White Photography
  • Digital Photography
  • Street Photogarphy
  • Still life
  • Sports action
  • Identity
  • Shock Tactics
  • Strict Diet (Models)
  • Cultural
  • Health awareness
  • Graphiti Art
  • Hate in society
  • Religious
  • Wild life
  • Drugs
  • Obesity
  • Body building
  • Signs and Symbols